Asylum & Protection — screening, interview preparation, and evidence-led submissions
We assess your protection grounds, prepare your statements and country evidence, guide you through the screening and substantive interviews, and file a clear, decision-ready bundle. Sub-pages: Asylum Claim · Humanitarian Protection · Fresh Claim
Asylum & Protection — screening, interview preparation, and evidence-led submissions
We assess your protection grounds, prepare your statements and country evidence, guide you through the screening and substantive interviews, and file a clear, decision-ready bundle. Sub-pages: Asylum Claim · Humanitarian Protection · Fresh Claim
Our Asylum & Protection Services
Choose the route that fits your situation. We prepare clear statements, country evidence, and a decision-ready submission
( Core route ) - Asylum Claim
- End-to-end support from screening to substantive interview, with evidence-led submissions tailored to your account.
- Screening & substantive interview preparation
- Personal statement & timeline consistency checks
- Country evidence (COI/CPIN) & risk analysis
( Alternative protection ) - Humanitarian Protection
- For serious harm risks where Refugee Convention grounds may not apply; clear, country-specific submissions.
- Risk of serious harm & internal relocation review
- Medical/rehabilitation & vulnerability evidence (where applicable)
- Country conditions & security situation mapping
( Further submissions ) - Fresh Claim
- Focused further submissions where new evidence or country changes create a realistic prospect of success.
- Rule 353 assessment & strategy
- New evidence gathering & credibility analysis
- Changed country conditions & expert reports
How it works
1-) Screening & triage
Caseworker applied the wrong rule or ignored mandatory policy. Incorrect legal threshold Guidance not followed
2Statement & timeline
Key documents were overlooked or incorrectly interpreted. Overlooked documents Factual misreadings
3-) Country evidence (COI/CPIN)
Procedural unfairness or defects within decision-making. Unfair process steps Notice/format defects
4-) Interview preparation
We show how the error could have changed the outcome. Causal link to result Correct remedy asked
5-) Submission, updates & decision
We submit a structured bundle, manage further information requests, and advise on outcomes — including appeal or fresh-claim strategy if needed.
Eligibility — what we assess
We review your protection reasons, personal evidence, and country information, and explain the best route and strategy.
( Refugee Convention ) - Convention reasons
- We map your account to the recognised reasons and evidence what happened and why you’re at risk.
- Race, religion, nationality
- Political opinion
- Particular social group
( Refugee Convention ) - Serious harm risk
- Where Convention reasons don’t fit, we assess serious harm and country conditions.
- Risk of death penalty or unlawful killing
- Torture or inhuman/degrading treatment
- Indiscriminate violence in conflict
( Credibility tests ) - Key decision factors
- Key decision factors
- We prepare you for how claims are assessed and address common challenges.
- Consistency & chronology
- Internal relocation & protection
- Delay and plausibility issues
( Family & vulnerabilities ) - Additional considerations
- Additional considerations
- We identify factors that affect route, evidence and interview adjustments.
- Dependants & family links
- Medical/mental health evidence
- Trafficking/modern slavery indicators
Evidence & documents
Identity & immigration history
Passport/ID or alternative identity evidence Visas, BRP/eVisa, previous applications/decisions Travel history (tickets, stamps, itineraries) Contact details & safe correspondence address
Personal statement & chronology
Detailed account of events & reasons for risk Chronology aligned with forms/interviews Trauma-informed drafting if vulnerable Consistency checks across all evidence
Corroboration & witnesses
Police/court/official records (where obtainable) Community/employer/NGO letters Family/friend statements (format guidance) Digital evidence (messages, media, metadata)
Country evidence & experts
COI/CPIN extracts & independent reports Internal relocation & protection analysis Medical/psychological assessments (if relevant) Translations & certified copies (as required)
Common issues we solve
We identify risks early, explain them clearly, and structure evidence so your protection claim is credible and decision-ready
Credibility & consistency
- We reconcile timeline gaps or inconsistencies across statements, interviews, forms and digital evidence to strengthen credibility.
Delay & late disclosure
- We set out trauma-informed reasons for delay, cultural barriers, fear, or previous advice issues — with supporting material.
Country evidence & relocation
- We address COI/CPIN conflicts, internal relocation and sufficiency-of-protection arguments with current country reports.
Vulnerability & medical evidence
- We obtain medico-legal/psychological assessments (where appropriate) and request reasonable interview adjustments.
Detention, reporting & housing
- Support with detained/accelerated processes, reporting conditions, and accommodation changes affecting evidence access.
Trafficking (NRM) crossovers
- We spot indicators of exploitation and coordinate NRM referrals alongside the asylum claim strategy when relevant.
Asylum & Protection — FAQs
Key answers about screening, interviews, evidence, and what happens after a decision.
The screening interview collects your basic details, travel route and initial reasons for claiming protection. We prepare you on practicalities, safeguarding, and how to give clear, consistent information.